-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
requirements: bump craft-providers #1219
Conversation
b7f3ea3
to
1892616
Compare
Signed-off-by: Callahan Kovacs <[email protected]>
1892616
to
963944c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM — can you leave it for me to merge? There's a fairly long merge queue that I'm trying to get through 🙂
Why there is a test in the bump |
To confirm the new craft-providers library is working as-expected (sergio's idea from pulse planning). I would be fine to split it into 2 separate commits to be pedantic. |
That's fine, but we should have multiple tests doing |
Can you explain what you mean? I think it is OK for many spread tests to use |
I mean it is OK to have specialized test for LXD. I was thinking we have multiple tests doing that |
Changelog
1.15.0 (2023-08-21)
base-v1
tobase-v2
snap refresh --hold
inside instancesResolves #1202
(CRAFT-1953)