Feat: Glyphs #639
Merged
Feat: Glyphs #639
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Can you please implement these as optional with a toggle in the settings tab. Please make the default be the current ones and define these as "Use Compatibility Glyphs (for Linux, etc)" |
|
Sorry I didn't read this carefully to see that you implemented my request already. Looking more carefully. |
cabarius
reviewed
Mar 8, 2022
cabarius
reviewed
Mar 8, 2022
cabarius
reviewed
Mar 8, 2022
cabarius
requested changes
Mar 8, 2022
Signed-off-by: dark0dave <[email protected]>
|
@cabarius no worries. I have updated the pr. |
cabarius
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix glyphs to use regular charcode.
From
#499
#483