Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(eslint): use eslint+prettier with ci strictly #165

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

manudeli
Copy link
Contributor

@manudeli manudeli commented Aug 12, 2023

What: use eslint+prettier with ci strictly

Why: strict auto format with eslint+prettier will make us maintain code quality easily. After setup like this, I want to make sure my code quality with more strict eslint rule before commiting in my local machine, not after GitHub Action with loose prettier rule on pr opened

How: eslint+prettier setup, use it in ci.yml

Checklist:

  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged

Copy link
Contributor Author

@manudeli manudeli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bvaughn
I leave comments as my intention

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
dist
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ignore eslint rule in built source

runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
command: ['pnpm lint', 'pnpm typescript', 'pnpm test']
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All quality check concurrently in single file

@manudeli manudeli marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2023 05:50
@manudeli
Copy link
Contributor Author

manudeli commented Aug 28, 2023

@bvaughn Could I get your review for this Pull Request?

@bvaughn bvaughn merged commit ed6d112 into bvaughn:master Dec 15, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants