We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OauthAuthorizationUri
https://oauth.bunq.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri=redirecturi&client_id=client_id&state=state
No & that divides the client_id and state parameters resulting in incorrect hash for clientId.
&
client_id
state
clientId
The URL should be: https://oauth.bunq.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri=redirecturi&client_id=client_idstate=state
https://oauth.bunq.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri=redirecturi&client_id=client_idstate=state
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fixed oauth uri construction to correctly handle additional params (b…
db9ad6d
…unq#126)
Hi @Nayels,
Thanks for raising this issue! 🙏🏼 I see we already have a pending PR for it. This will be fixed in the upcoming release (1.14.1).
Sorry, something went wrong.
angelomelonas
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Steps to reproduce:
OauthAuthorizationUri
with stateWhat should happen:
https://oauth.bunq.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri=redirecturi&client_id=client_id&state=state
What happens:
No
&
that divides theclient_id
andstate
parameters resulting in incorrect hash forclientId
.The URL should be:
https://oauth.bunq.com/auth?response_type=code&redirect_uri=redirecturi&client_id=client_idstate=state
SDK version and environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: