-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
wire: add bitcoin network magic for default SigNet #2276
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Approved CI. |
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ const ( | |||
// TestNet3 represents the test network (version 3). | |||
TestNet3 BitcoinNet = 0x0709110b | |||
|
|||
// SigNet represents the signet (default). | |||
SigNet BitcoinNet = 0x40CF030A |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this documented anywhere? Doesn't seem to be in the OG BIP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I copied the constant from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_documentation#Common_structures
The constant is equal to chaincfg.SigNetParams.Net
, this is checked in new test TestSigNetMagic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should also be equal to CustomSignetParams(DefaultSignetChallenge, nil).Net
, or:
challengeLength := byte(len(DefaultSignetChallenge))
hashDouble := chainhash.DoubleHashB(
append([]byte{challengeLength}, challenge...),
)
net := binary.LittleEndian.Uint32(hashDouble[0:4])
Perhaps we can add a simple test case for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I guess that's what we're doing with TestSigNetMagic
, so never mind.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11956947932Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one clarification request, otherwise LGTM 🎉
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ const ( | |||
// TestNet3 represents the test network (version 3). | |||
TestNet3 BitcoinNet = 0x0709110b | |||
|
|||
// SigNet represents the signet (default). | |||
SigNet BitcoinNet = 0x40CF030A |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should also be equal to CustomSignetParams(DefaultSignetChallenge, nil).Net
, or:
challengeLength := byte(len(DefaultSignetChallenge))
hashDouble := chainhash.DoubleHashB(
append([]byte{challengeLength}, challenge...),
)
net := binary.LittleEndian.Uint32(hashDouble[0:4])
Perhaps we can add a simple test case for it?
wire/protocol.go
Outdated
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ const ( | |||
// TestNet3 represents the test network (version 3). | |||
TestNet3 BitcoinNet = 0x0709110b | |||
|
|||
// SigNet represents the signet (default). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this is probably the way it's called in most places (signet (default)
), though I think we could make it a bit more obvious that this is only one of many possible signets, we could add something like: // SigNet represents the public default SigNet. For custom signets, see
CustomSignetParams`.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Fixed.
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ const ( | |||
// TestNet3 represents the test network (version 3). | |||
TestNet3 BitcoinNet = 0x0709110b | |||
|
|||
// SigNet represents the signet (default). | |||
SigNet BitcoinNet = 0x40CF030A |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I guess that's what we're doing with TestSigNetMagic
, so never mind.
Added constant wire.SigNet, added it to stringer for BitcoinNet type. Added a test in chaincfg to compare calculated magic value with the constant.
Added constant wire.SigNet, added it to stringer for BitcoinNet type.
Added a test in chaincfg to compare calculated magic value with the constant.