-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comparing Different models #23
Comments
I'll have to look through my notes later, but from what I remember:
|
Thank you for the information! These will be very helpful.
Thanks,
Shahab
…On Fri, Jan 29, 2021, 2:59 PM Aaron Gokaslan ***@***.***> wrote:
I'll have to look through my notes later, but from what I remember:
- Image Size: Kept constant among all models if possible. Some like
DiscoGAN required lower resolution input and so they were downsampled.
- Optimizer: Whatever optimizer was used for the model, same for LR
(fidelling with those can make GANs mode collapse really easily)
- Number of epochs: until the epoch decay was exhausted for that
model. (We did try adjusting num epochs / decay epochs on them, but they
didn't improve quality.
- Number of decay epochs were kept constant among all ablations. For
baselines, we used the recommended number of decay epochs from their
respective papers.
- We used the final saved generator.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#23 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANB7Q22W5P72WMBPJYIS6CDS4MHRRANCNFSM4WYHHQDA>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
Could you please tell me how you compared different models? Did you use the same learning rate, number of epochs, Number of decay epochs, image size, optimizer among all models? Also, did you collect test results using the final saved generator or did you use the best results testing all saved generators at different epochs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: