Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparing Different models #23

Open
mohammadshahabuddin opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Comparing Different models #23

mohammadshahabuddin opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@mohammadshahabuddin
Copy link

Hi,
Could you please tell me how you compared different models? Did you use the same learning rate, number of epochs, Number of decay epochs, image size, optimizer among all models? Also, did you collect test results using the final saved generator or did you use the best results testing all saved generators at different epochs?

@Skylion007
Copy link
Contributor

I'll have to look through my notes later, but from what I remember:

  • Image Size: Kept constant among all models if possible. Some like DiscoGAN required lower resolution input and so they were downsampled.
  • Optimizer: Whatever optimizer was used for the model, same for LR (fidelling with those can make GANs mode collapse really easily)
  • Number of epochs: until the epoch decay was exhausted for that model. (We did try adjusting num epochs / decay epochs on them, but they didn't improve quality.
  • Number of decay epochs were kept constant among all ablations. For baselines, we used the recommended number of decay epochs from their respective papers.
  • We used the final saved generator.

@mohammadshahabuddin
Copy link
Author

mohammadshahabuddin commented Jan 29, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants