Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gc getpipeupsummaries use mappingqualityreadfilter #8781

Merged

Conversation

gokalpcelik
Copy link
Contributor

GetPileupSummaries tool is adjusted to use the standard MappingQualityReadFilter as other walkers. Default value is set to 50 as in the original one. Old parameter set is removed and documentation is updated.

Copy link
Contributor

@droazen droazen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me provided @davidbenjamin is also ok with it

* <p>
* Finally for those using mappers other than bwa mem or dragen-os, {@code --minimum-mapping-quality} threshold is
* set to 50, which limits the usable reads that tool considers for generating pileups. Certain mappers are known to
* assign scores less that this threshold even for the unique mappers. If you observe all empty results in your
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean "unique mappings" rather than "unique mappers"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes. Typo at midnight. I will fix it shortly.

@davidbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor

This is fine with me.

@gokalpcelik gokalpcelik merged commit aed8b1b into master Apr 18, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@gokalpcelik gokalpcelik deleted the gc_getpipeupsummaries_use_mappingqualityreadfilter branch April 18, 2024 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants