-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 594
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable the red "X" from failing codeCov builds and delay the posting of coverage information to complete test. #7817
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7817 +/- ##
===============================================
+ Coverage 86.941% 86.942% +0.001%
- Complexity 36860 36866 +6
===============================================
Files 2211 2211
Lines 173376 173376
Branches 18710 18709 -1
===============================================
+ Hits 150734 150736 +2
+ Misses 16055 16052 -3
- Partials 6587 6588 +1
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
|
||
|
||
comment: | ||
layout: "header, diff, changes, sunburst, uncovered, tree" | ||
branches: null | ||
behavior: default | ||
after_n_builds: 8 # Wait until all 8 of the test suite jacoco test builds have been uploaded before writing a comment to the pr (no more incomplete coverage report emails) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice find
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://docs.codecov.com/docs/codecovyml-reference#codecovnotifywait_for_ci is another option that isn't tied to the build specifics
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lbergelson I'm testing it over in #7818. If it works there I'll pull that commit into this branch and merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Louis i've tried a few modes of that option. It doesn't seem to work so far as i can tell. There is probably something I misunderstand. I'm going to merge this approach since it does work.
Repost of #7815 to test the "after_n_builds" functionality