Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix requester pays access harder. #7716 #7730

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 7, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lbergelson
Copy link
Member

* The previous attempt to fix requester pays didn't fix it in many cases.
This incorporates a newer version of the NIO library with several patches to fix
edge cases we were hitting.
  * googleapis/java-storage-nio#849
  * googleapis/java-storage-nio#856
  * googleapis/java-storage-nio#857
* upgrade com.google.cloud:google-cloud-nio:0.123.23 ->0.123.25
* fixes #7716
@lbergelson lbergelson requested a review from droazen March 18, 2022 20:11
@gatk-bot
Copy link

gatk-bot commented Mar 18, 2022

Travis reported job failures from build 38164
Failures in the following jobs:

Test Type JDK Job ID Logs
cloud openjdk8 38164.1 logs
cloud openjdk11 38164.14 logs
conda openjdk8 38164.5 logs
integration openjdk8 38164.2 logs
variantcalling openjdk8 38164.4 logs

@gatk-bot
Copy link

gatk-bot commented Mar 18, 2022

Travis reported job failures from build 38168
Failures in the following jobs:

Test Type JDK Job ID Logs
cloud openjdk11 38168.14 logs
cloud openjdk8 38168.1 logs
integration openjdk8 38168.2 logs
conda openjdk8 38168.5 logs
variantcalling openjdk8 38168.4 logs

@gatk-bot
Copy link

gatk-bot commented Mar 18, 2022

Travis reported job failures from build 38170
Failures in the following jobs:

Test Type JDK Job ID Logs
cloud openjdk8 38170.1 logs
cloud openjdk11 38170.14 logs
conda openjdk8 38170.5 logs
integration openjdk8 38170.2 logs
variantcalling openjdk8 38170.4 logs

@droazen
Copy link
Contributor

droazen commented Mar 25, 2022

As discussed with @lbergelson, I tested this patch manually on my local machine as well as on a clean Google Cloud VM and found it to work perfectly in all cases. I believe that the test failures here are artifacts of some configuration issue with the Travis CI VM environment, rather than indicative of a real problem. I'll see if I can recruit an external user who ran into the requester pays issue to test this branch for additional confirmation.

@gatk-bot
Copy link

gatk-bot commented Apr 1, 2022

Travis reported job failures from build 38393
Failures in the following jobs:

Test Type JDK Job ID Logs
cloud openjdk8 38393.1 logs
cloud openjdk11 38393.14 logs
conda openjdk8 38393.5 logs
integration openjdk8 38393.2 logs
variantcalling openjdk8 38393.4 logs

@droazen
Copy link
Contributor

droazen commented Apr 6, 2022

Filed #7763 -- will merge this as soon as tests pass

@gatk-bot
Copy link

gatk-bot commented Apr 6, 2022

Travis reported job failures from build 38567
Failures in the following jobs:

Test Type JDK Job ID Logs
integration openjdk8 38567.2 logs
conda openjdk8 38567.5 logs
variantcalling openjdk8 38567.4 logs

Copy link
Contributor

@droazen droazen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 This is ready to go in

@droazen droazen merged commit 9d4fe23 into master Apr 7, 2022
@droazen droazen deleted the lb_refix_requester_pays branch April 7, 2022 19:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants