Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prune assembly graph before checking for cycles #5562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2019

Conversation

davidbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor

@ldgauthier This doesn't hurt M2 on our evaluations but should I do anything to check that it's okay for HaplotypeCaller?

Copy link
Contributor

@ldgauthier ldgauthier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 is definitely more sensitive, so if you're happy I'm happy.

I'm also happy (and surprised) that none of the integration test outputs change, but I hate changing code without changing tests. Do you think the user would let us use a hundred or so bp of his/her data as a regression test?

@ldgauthier
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, what about Sarah's MT data instead? That should be fine to use.

@davidbenjamin davidbenjamin force-pushed the db_prune_before_cycle_check branch from 5531bfd to 1200903 Compare February 26, 2019 19:53
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 26, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #5562 into master will decrease coverage by 1.404%.
The diff coverage is 9.091%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##              master     #5562       +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage     87.062%   85.658%   -1.404%     
+ Complexity     31879     31243      -636     
===============================================
  Files           1940      1940               
  Lines         146799    146748       -51     
  Branches       16233     16227        -6     
===============================================
- Hits          127806    125701     -2105     
- Misses         13073     15050     +1977     
- Partials        5920      5997       +77
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...aplotypecaller/HaplotypeCallerIntegrationTest.java 5.388% <0%> (-82.718%) 9 <0> (-76)
...pecaller/readthreading/ReadThreadingAssembler.java 63.077% <100%> (-5%) 47 <0> (-5)
...ct/CreateSomaticPanelOfNormalsIntegrationTest.java 3.448% <0%> (-94.253%) 2% <0%> (-8%)
...ls/walkers/mutect/CreateSomaticPanelOfNormals.java 0% <0%> (-93.846%) 0% <0%> (-21%)
...r/tools/walkers/mutect/Mutect2IntegrationTest.java 5.111% <0%> (-86.882%) 2% <0%> (-90%)
...alkers/mutect/SomaticReferenceConfidenceModel.java 12.5% <0%> (-84.375%) 1% <0%> (-7%)
...ls/genomicsdb/GenomicsDBImportIntegrationTest.java 9.313% <0%> (-79.157%) 2% <0%> (-78%)
...kers/haplotypecaller/ReferenceConfidenceUtils.java 0% <0%> (-66.667%) 0% <0%> (-1%)
...der/tools/HaplotypeCallerSparkIntegrationTest.java 2.439% <0%> (-65.854%) 2% <0%> (-14%)
... and 75 more

@davidbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ldgauthier I put in a regression test from the user's data.

@davidbenjamin davidbenjamin force-pushed the db_prune_before_cycle_check branch from 7260473 to 1646c03 Compare February 27, 2019 03:48
Copy link
Contributor

@ldgauthier ldgauthier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beautiful, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants