-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WX-769 disks
compatibility for TES backend
#6991
Changes from all commits
07282b5
7c7bcc6
16dadcf
4d2fb71
9de9059
c82ae1d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ lazy val tesBackend = (project in backendRoot / "tes") | |
.dependsOn(ftpFileSystem) | ||
.dependsOn(drsFileSystem) | ||
.dependsOn(azureBlobFileSystem) | ||
// TES backend provides a compatibility layer to run WDLs with PAPI runtime attributes [WX-769] | ||
.dependsOn(googlePipelinesCommon) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I know we discussed moving this disk-parsing stuff out to a common library, and also that you were running into some build issues - did that end up being harder than expected? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The broad choices were:
At standup I referred to issues with (1), once I got (2) to work I was satisfied. (3) is possible but expands scope quite a bit. |
||
.dependsOn(backend % "test->test") | ||
.dependsOn(common % "test->test") | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thousand points for remembering to update the changelog!