-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
API phpunit 9 support #52
API phpunit 9 support #52
Conversation
f062977
to
907b3e3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Builds are failing and I don't have permission to re-run them.
.travis.yml
Outdated
after_success: | ||
- if [[ $PHPUNIT_COVERAGE_TEST ]]; then bash <(curl -s https://codecov.io/bash) -f coverage.xml; fi | ||
import: | ||
- silverstripe/silverstripe-travis-shared:config/provision/standard-jobs-range.yml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the point of using the travis CI build if travis is not running?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not alot :-) Removed
907b3e3
to
54d2313
Compare
@maxime-rainville failing unit test requires tagging a new minor of queuedjobs which requires unreleased framework ^4.10 - we should probably just merge this as is |
I don't think tagging a new minor would be terrible ... composer wouldn't be incline to install it if it's set to prefer stable. That's another example why I think not getting the manifest to ignore tests is not a viable choice. I'll go through the other PRs and come back to this one later on |
54d2313
to
d6fb30a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Issue silverstripe/silverstripe-framework#10019