Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(terraform): Fix an edge case in AbsRDSParameter check #3903

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2022

Conversation

ChanochShayner
Copy link
Contributor

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Description

Fix an edge case in AbsRDSParameter check.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my feature, policy, or fix is effective and works
  • New and existing tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ def scan_resource_conf(self, conf):
params = conf.get("parameters")
if params and isinstance(params, list):
for param in params:
if param['name'][0] == self.parameter and (param['value'][0]).lower() == 'on':
if isinstance(param, dict) and param['name'][0] == self.parameter and (param['value'][0]).lower() == 'on':
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add UT?

@ChanochShayner ChanochShayner merged commit 9021b3f into master Nov 20, 2022
@ChanochShayner ChanochShayner deleted the fix-check-AbsRDSParameter branch November 20, 2022 09:34
gruebel pushed a commit to gruebel/checkov that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants