Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(terraform): Dynamic blocks - added support for lookup null/true/false values #3893

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2022

Conversation

ChanochShayner
Copy link
Contributor

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Description

Fixed an issue where null/false/true values in lookup do not work as expected.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my feature, policy, or fix is effective and works
  • New and existing tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@ChanochShayner ChanochShayner changed the title fix(terraform) Dynamic blocks - added support for lookup null/true/false values fix(terraform): Dynamic blocks - added support for lookup null/true/false values Nov 16, 2022
@ChanochShayner ChanochShayner merged commit 38b1fe8 into master Nov 17, 2022
@ChanochShayner ChanochShayner deleted the dynamic-blocks-fix-for-null-lookup branch November 17, 2022 06:56
NandhiniC-PAN pushed a commit to NandhiniC-PAN/checkov that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2022
…alse values (bridgecrewio#3893)

Dynamic blocks - added support for null/true/false values
@ChanochShayner ChanochShayner self-assigned this Feb 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants