Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Brave Ads confirmation systemTimestamp user data should be recreated for retries #17584

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2023

Conversation

tmancey
Copy link
Collaborator

@tmancey tmancey commented Mar 13, 2023

Resolves brave/brave-browser#29005

Submitter Checklist:

  • I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed, or that I have requested one
  • There is a ticket for my issue
  • Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
  • Wrote a good PR/commit description
  • Squashed any review feedback or "fixup" commits before merge, so that history is a record of what happened in the repo, not your PR
  • Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
  • Checked the PR locally:
    • npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests wiki
    • npm run lint, npm run presubmit wiki, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
  • Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

  • A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
  • New files have MPL-2.0 license header
  • Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
  • Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
  • Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
  • Code follows the style guide
  • Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

Test Plan:

Confirm systemTimestamp in payloads when redeeming unblinded tokens contains the timestamp when retrying with minutes, seconds and milliseconds set to 0 (createdAtTimestamp should be the time the confirmation was originally created).

@tmancey tmancey self-assigned this Mar 13, 2023
@tmancey tmancey requested a review from a team as a code owner March 13, 2023 16:57
@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/29005 branch 4 times, most recently from 557276a to 333d5f4 Compare March 16, 2023 15:25
@tmancey tmancey marked this pull request as draft March 17, 2023 10:27
@tmancey tmancey changed the title Fix Brave Ads systemTimestamp user data should be recreated for retries Remove Brave Ads confirmation systemTimestamp user data Mar 17, 2023
@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/29005 branch 8 times, most recently from 63131fd to 15f9c33 Compare March 17, 2023 15:19
@tmancey tmancey marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2023 15:55
*this = other;
}

UserDataInfo& UserDataInfo::operator=(const UserDataInfo& other) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we can make UserDataInfo as non-copiable?

@tmancey tmancey changed the title Remove Brave Ads confirmation systemTimestamp user data Fix Brave Ads confirmation systemTimestamp user data should be recreated for retries Mar 18, 2023
@tmancey tmancey force-pushed the issues/29005 branch 2 times, most recently from 4b44d9f to 154e5c1 Compare March 18, 2023 19:47
*this = other;
}

OptedInUserDataInfo& OptedInUserDataInfo::operator=(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would it be better to do a separate Clone() method for OptedInUserDataInfo? WDYT?

Copy link
Collaborator

@aseren aseren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tmancey tmancey enabled auto-merge March 22, 2023 10:47
@tmancey tmancey merged commit fe65810 into master Mar 22, 2023
@tmancey tmancey deleted the issues/29005 branch March 22, 2023 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

systemTimestamp user data should be regenerated for confirmation retries
2 participants