Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Java 17 upgrade #369

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Java 17 upgrade #369

merged 12 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

ewilkins-csi
Copy link
Contributor

Now that 1.9 has been cut and dev is on 1.10 we can merge in the Java upgrade branch. This will allow us to work directly off of dev instead of managing a feature branch.

@carter-cundiff
Copy link
Contributor

Q: Will we need to upgrade the CI jobs to use jdk 17?

@ewilkins-csi ewilkins-csi force-pushed the feature-java17 branch 3 times, most recently from 6a8160c to 90f451e Compare October 1, 2024 17:00
ewilkins-csi and others added 11 commits October 1, 2024 12:01
 - pull scala version up to build-parent
 - fix relative parent path warning
 - remove unused imports
 - remove unused inf recursion
 - fix package path
 - fix string utils import
 - rename smallrye graphql version property
 - move logging dependencies up to root so they can be used in build-support
 - add more Apache commons to root
 - remove unused incremental build profile
 - remove unused fields/imports
 - add plugin version to cucumberin build-support
 - de-duplicate fabric8 conf in spark-infrastructure
 - remove pom/bom import from dependencies in invocation-service
 - fix templates (bom removal and groupId fix)
 - simplify pipeline CDI with composition
[#354] Modified PDP to build with Java 17
356 Update mavenUtils to be compatable with jdk17
356 Create aissemble compatible quarkus bom
356 Create migration to update spark configs with version update
 #356 Correct foundation core pyproject imports
Disable `metadata` as it is failing, and bump the Java installation in
the build/release actions to 17.
@ewilkins-csi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Q: Will we need to upgrade the CI jobs to use jdk 17?

Addressed in the latest commit

@ewilkins-csi ewilkins-csi merged commit ac3f1a3 into dev Oct 2, 2024
1 check passed
@ewilkins-csi ewilkins-csi deleted the feature-java17 branch October 2, 2024 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants