PARTIAL: Begin pull request task #3
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. DetailsInterpreterError at template.tasks[1].metadata.name: unknown context value chunk |
1 similar comment
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. DetailsInterpreterError at template.tasks[1].metadata.name: unknown context value chunk |
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. DetailsInterpreterError at template.tasks[1].metadata.owner: object has no property pusher |
1 similar comment
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. DetailsInterpreterError at template.tasks[1].metadata.owner: object has no property pusher |
jugglinmike
force-pushed
the
taskcluster-stability
branch
from
1b1c0fc to
a3aea8f
Compare
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. DetailsInterpreterError at template.tasks[1].payload.command[3]: object has no property ref |
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. DetailsInterpreterError at template.tasks[1].payload.command[3]: unknown context value command |
jugglinmike
force-pushed
the
taskcluster-stability
branch
from
dcbe2b4 to
7ba3043
Compare
This simplification is intended to support a future extension to validate pull requests.
jugglinmike
force-pushed
the
taskcluster-stability
branch
from
0064a9b to
49127dd
Compare
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. Detailsexpected hexadecimal character at line 133, column 58: |
Submitting the task to Taskcluster failed. Detailsexpected hexadecimal character at line 133, column 58: |
jugglinmike
force-pushed
the
taskcluster-stability
branch
from
f372451 to
af1f51b
Compare
This turned out to be unnecessary
jugglinmike
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a19a236 to
6ae38c9
Compare
jugglinmike
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype. When Object.prototype.a is set to:
{b: {c: 'on proto'}}
chromedriver fails with:
JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
(Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)
Remote-end stacktrace:
#0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
#1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
#2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
#3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
#4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
#5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
#6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
#7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
#8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
#9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
#10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
#11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
#12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
#13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
web-platform-tests#14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
web-platform-tests#15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
web-platform-tests#16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
web-platform-tests#17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
web-platform-tests#18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
web-platform-tests#19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
web-platform-tests#20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
web-platform-tests#21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
web-platform-tests#22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone
Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
• 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
• 1 tests had errors unexpectedly
Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.
While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().
The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.
Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
jugglinmike
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2019
All tests pass, and crashes no longer happen. I believe that code will not longer crash, but there might be futher instances of incorrect positioning. Fix #1 LayoutDescendantCandidates did not sweep newly discovered candidates. This was done manually once inside NGOutOfFlowLayoutPart::Run, and sweep was not performed for LayoutDescendantCandidates found in Legacy. Fix is to make LayoutDescendantCandidates perform sweep instead. Fix #2 fix #1 exposed a bug where duplicate fragments were generated for a single layout object. This happened when NG was generating fragments not inside ContainingBlock. Fix one instance of this inside NGOutOfFlowLayoutPart::IsContainingBlockForDescendant by making sure that OOF with inline containers are only positioned inside its ContainingBlock() Fix #3 NGOutOfFlowLayoutPart::LayoutDescendant offset adjustment. Bug: 935805 Change-Id: I9f7ebbc7223f40fbbf6ba3739d9385bfd59e3641 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1517093 Commit-Queue: Aleks Totic <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Morten Stenshorne <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Koji Ishii <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#641628}
jugglinmike
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2019
This reverts commit 712c3cf3ed8201420acf23f760eaa34be20781cd. Reason for revert: This patch causes webkit-layout-tests failure on WebKit_Linux_Trusty_ASAN bot: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/ci/WebKit%20Linux%20Trusty%20ASAN/25720 Unexpected Failures: * external/wpt/css/css-scroll-snap/scroll-snap-type.html * virtual/threaded/external/wpt/css/css-scroll-snap/scroll-snap-type.html STDERR: ==1==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x61200023f8d8 at pc 0x5620c924e56d bp 0x7ffde3c56830 sp 0x7ffde3c56828 STDERR: READ of size 8 at 0x61200023f8d8 thread T0 (content_shell) STDERR: #0 0x5620c924e56c in get ./../../base/memory/scoped_refptr.h:212:27 STDERR: #1 0x5620c924e56c in Style ./../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_object.h:1615:0 STDERR: #2 0x5620c924e56c in GetPhysicalSnapType ./../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/page/scrolling/snap_coordinator.cc:88:0 STDERR: #3 0x5620c924e56c in blink::SnapCoordinator::UpdateSnapContainerData(blink::LayoutBox&) ./../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/page/scrolling/snap_coordinator.cc:107:0 STDERR: #4 0x5620c924e74b in blink::SnapCoordinator::UpdateAllSnapContainerData() ./../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/page/scrolling/snap_coordinator.cc:76:5 Original change's description: > Correctly handle scroll-snap-type changes to 'none' > > > Previously when a scroll container's snap type is changed to 'none' its > data was discarded including all of its snap areas. However this is > incorrect. Because while the snap type is 'none', the element is still > a scroll container which per spec [1] means that is should continue to > captures the snap areas in its subtree for whom it is the nearest > ancestor scroll container . The only difference is that it no longer > snaps. > > The fix is that we no longer remove the snap container data just > because is has a 'none' snap type and instead keep it and its snap > areas. But we check the snap type before performing any snap. > > To ensure this does not introduce any performance regression, this CL > also includes an optimization where we avoid re-calculating > snap_container_data when the snap type is 'none'. So keeping these snap > data should not be cheap. > > Note that there is another problem where if the current snap container > is no longer a scroll container (e.g., overflow: scroll => overflow: > visible) we release its snap areas and they become "orphan". But if we > are to do this correctly, we should re-assign these areas to the next > stroller in the chain. Similarly when an element becomes a scroll > container, it can potentially take over snap areas from its parent snap > container. > > > This patch does not address that situation yet but fixes the easier > problem. > > [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#overview > > Bug: 953575 > Test: > - wpt/css/css-scroll-snap/scroll-snap-type-change.html => Changing snap-type should work correctly > - wpt/css/css-scroll-snap/scroll-snap-type.html => Add a specific test for type 'none' to ensure it does not snap > > Change-Id: Ie493ad68ecba818ed41c0ee103ccf44725ff6e3f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1589899 > Reviewed-by: Majid Valipour <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: David Bokan <[email protected]> > Commit-Queue: Majid Valipour <[email protected]> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#657460} [email protected],[email protected] Change-Id: I3a327f6e342e95d045194d24ceaf49de52b2b921 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: 953575 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1600437 Reviewed-by: Takashi Sakamoto <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Takashi Sakamoto <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#657571}
jugglinmike
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2019
…iner height
See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.
Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.
(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)
#0 blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
#1 0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
#2 0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
#3 0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
#4 0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
#5 0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
#6 0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
#7 0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
#8 0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
#9 0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
#10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
#11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
#12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
#13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369
Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1902514
Commit-Queue: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Christian Biesinger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#713296}
zcorpan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2021
…eVisibilityKeeper::PrepareToSplitBlockElement()` before splitting a text node It does the following things when caret is collapsed in a text node in a `<p>` or `<div>` element. 1. Split the text node containing caret to insert `<br>` element 2. Insert `<br>` element after it 3. Split ancestor elements which inclusive descendants of the `<p>` or `<div>` 4. Delete the `<br>` element if unnecessary from the left paragraph #3 and #4 are performed by `HTMLEditor::SplitParagraph()` and it calls `WhiteSpaceVisibilityKeeper::PrepareToSplitBlockElement()` correctly before splitting the block. However, in the case (caret is at middle of a text node), the text has already been split to 2 nodes because of #1. Therefore, it fails to handle to keep the white-space visibility. So that I believe that the root cause of this bug is, the method does much complicated things which are required, and doing the redundant things will eat memory space due to undo transactions. However, for now, I'd like to fix this with a simple patch which just call the preparation method before splitting the text node because I'd like to uplift this if it'd be approved (Note that this is not a recent regression, the root cause was created by bug 92686 which was fixed in 17 years ago: <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/commit/2e66280faef73e9be218e00758d4eb738395ac83>, but must be annoying bug for users who see this frequently). The new WPTs are pass in Chrome. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D130950 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1740416 gecko-commit: 73567f6c2bcfa078836a36760498bb11747561dd gecko-reviewers: m_kato, smaug
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.