Enable taproot address #408
Conversation
slavastartsev
requested review from
sander2,
gregdhill,
nud3l and
danielsimao
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Tests |
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
73a3f39 to
f4a8be9
Compare
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
bc51614 to
ccab344
Compare
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
2c98bcc to
4a356f2
Compare
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
4a356f2 to
ffab55c
Compare
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
ffab55c to
bff7f3c
Compare
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
bff7f3c to
7261ca5
Compare
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
c77a098 to
5247fb9
Compare
| vi.mock(import('@scure/btc-signer'), async (importOriginal) => { | ||
| const actual = await importOriginal(); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| ...actual, | ||
| selectUTXO: vi.fn(actual.selectUTXO), | ||
| }; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the purpose of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it allows us to check what arguments it was called with.
- vi.fn - mock/spy function
- actual.selectUTXO - original function implementation
so when it will be called it will run the same code + we can spy on arguments/errors/return values
sdk/test/utxo.test.ts
Outdated
| const maxSpendableBalance = cardinalOutputs.reduce((acc, output) => acc + output.value, 0); | ||
|
|
||
| // spend 90% of max spendable amount | ||
| await createBitcoinPsbt(paymentAddress, paymentAddress, Math.floor(maxSpendableBalance * 0.9), pubkey); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should check this fails, check the balance of the address including ordinals, try to create the UTXO and check it throws an error that the account has insufficient balance. I think this test is not really doing anything useful right now since we're checking only the cardinal balance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test is checking that when we create psbt none of the possible inputs contains inscriptions -- @sander2 wanted that to be tested.
I've added a test that checks if it throws an error if we try to spend max balance including ordinals. I think this new test is more general and works (throws) with all types of addresses, not just p2tr.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm actually yeah you are right that this test is still valid
slavastartsev
force-pushed
the
feat/taproot-address
branch
from
f06e1cf to
4ba6d93
Compare
No description provided.