bugfix(op-node): syncClient incorrectly removes peer issue #50
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
When the staticPeer is configured with a DNS address (such as
/dns/xxx.com/tcp/xxx/p2p/xxx
), a peer can obtain multiple IP addresses through domain name resolution. However, in Libp2p, dialing concurrently can result in one peer corresponding to multiple connections, which is exacerbated by multiple IP addresses. If one of the connections is disconnected due to an unstable network or other reasons, theNotifiee.Disconnected
event is triggered. At this time, the peer is removed from the syncClient, and the processing flow of the peerLoop exits. The log displays the messagestopped syncing loop of peer
. However, the peer still has other connections that can be used for p2p synchronization. Therefore, we should not remove this peer unless we determine that all of its connections are disconnected and there are no available connections, just like the check performed by themonitorStaticPeers
function.Solution
Add a condition to determine when to remove a peer from the syncClient: only remove the peer if it cannot establish a connection.