Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ability to verify bytecode without bytecode hash #5136

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

nikitosing
Copy link
Member

@nikitosing nikitosing commented Jan 27, 2022

Motivation

It was not possible to verify contract if json file had "bytecodeHash": "none" parameter

Changelog

  • Add ability to verify bytecode without bytecode hash
  • Increase ownership_timeout to prevent tests fail

Checklist for your Pull Request (PR)

@nikitosing nikitosing force-pushed the np-fix-verifying-without-bytecodeHash branch 2 times, most recently from 1a50958 to 3f7f0db Compare January 27, 2022 17:12
@nikitosing nikitosing force-pushed the np-fix-verifying-without-bytecodeHash branch 4 times, most recently from 1d97b72 to 653222d Compare February 15, 2022 13:45
@nikitosing nikitosing force-pushed the np-fix-verifying-without-bytecodeHash branch from e0e2f17 to 6be8e4b Compare February 15, 2022 17:21
@nikitosing nikitosing force-pushed the np-fix-verifying-without-bytecodeHash branch 2 times, most recently from 2fd9724 to b5ee91c Compare March 10, 2022 17:01
@nikitosing nikitosing force-pushed the np-fix-verifying-without-bytecodeHash branch from d77dba3 to 7088dca Compare March 10, 2022 17:54
@vbaranov vbaranov merged commit ba8e41c into master Mar 11, 2022
@vbaranov vbaranov deleted the np-fix-verifying-without-bytecodeHash branch March 11, 2022 06:57
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/blockscout that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2022
…ithout-bytecodeHash

Add ability to verify bytecode without bytecode hash
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants