[BITAU-131] Add Popup to QR Code Scan to Add Code to Bitwarden

[brant-livefront]

🎟️ Tracking

BITAU-131

📔 Objective

The main objective of this PR is to add the ability to save QR code scans in the Bitwarden PM app when they originate from the Authenticator app. There's a couple of pieces in support of this:

• A new dialog that appears the first time and asks the user if they would like to save the code locally or send it to Bitwarden
• A second new dialog that appears (only the first time) asking if they'd like to set whatever option they have chosen as their default.
• A new pair of app settings
  • defaultSaveOption - this records where the user wants to save codes by default (locally, in Bitwarden, or ask each time)
  • hasSeenDefaultSaveOptionPrompt - this tells us if they've seen the dialog asking them to set their default. We only show it once. After that, everything is controlled by the defaultSaveOption.
• A new row in Settings to allow the user to change their defaultSaveOption.

Dialog flow

• If the user has seen the dialog about setting their default, we always respect their preference
  • This means we either immediately process the code (locally or sending it to the PM app), or we show the dialog and follow their choice from there.
• If they have not seen the dialog:
  • First we show them the dialog asking where they'd like to save the code (over the QR scan view)
  • Second, we show them another dialog asking them if they'd like to make that their default (over the Item List view)
  • Finally, we save their choice and take action on their code (either saving locally or sending it to the PM app)

Testing notes

• As with the other PRs, make sure you have both the PM and Auth feature flags enabled
• Make sure you're using an otpauth:// style QR code
• Make sure you've already enabled sync for at least one account in the PM app.

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 79.56989% with 38 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.24%. Comparing base (e50d624) to head (2937ba0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...d/UI/Platform/Settings/Settings/SettingsView.swift	30.18%	37 Missing ⚠️
...UI/Vault/ItemList/ItemList/ItemListProcessor.swift	98.73%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #177      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.09%   67.24%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         211      213       +2     
  Lines        9300     9473     +173     
==========================================
+ Hits         6240     6370     +130     
- Misses       3060     3103      +43     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 802c6eda-af6c-4d64-a71c-e15e65b63391

No New Or Fixed Issues Found