You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's currently hard to interpret the clock plots as they are relative to the measurement clock, which is (IMO) the main reason #604 has been able to go unnoticed for multiple months. I propose assuming one of the clock offsets is correct, and shifting the y-axis until it is set in its "proper" place.
E.g., this (example plots still affected by #606):
It's currently hard to interpret the clock plots as they are relative to the measurement clock, which is (IMO) the main reason #604 has been able to go unnoticed for multiple months. I propose assuming one of the clock offsets is correct, and shifting the y-axis until it is set in its "proper" place.
E.g., this (example plots still affected by #606):
Should be approximately:
Should also be mentioned in #603
We should probably also be able to generate "debug" plots, where we show the position of the reference clock.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: