-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft for p2sh multisig wallet structure #89
Conversation
==Motivation== | ||
|
||
The structure proposed in this document allows for standard ways to create, | ||
use, import, and HDPM wallets. It allows to handle multiple parties sharing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
HDPM = hierarchical deterministic P2SH multi-signature, as defined above.
Or is there another typo there? (I can't english)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"create, use, import, and HDPM wallets."
I suspect what you mean is "create, use, and import HDPM wallets.", or maybe you accidentally a word and it should be "create, use, import, and HDPM wallets."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, thanks!
This seems to be stuck? As this has been discussed on the mailing list and the response is positive, I think you should move to the next phase and request a BIP number from gmaxwell. |
I already did, 3 times in the past 6 months. There's no rush but @gmaxwell has been unresponsive so far. On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan
|
It wouldn't be the first time it takes a long time - @gmaxwell is very busy, but I don't think number allocation should be a blocker in the BIP process. As I've stated in the past, I think we need more BIP editors that can deal these out to avoid this. |
Gah. BIP 45. |
95e1d68
to
3d88667
Compare
updated with assigned number |
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
*.swp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't add a project-wide gitignore. Gitignore is meant for temporary files that are generated during the build process. We don't have a build system for bips, so there are none.
There are various other ways in which you can see local ignore rules, see https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for explaining! I didn't know about local ignore rules :)
Don't forget to add an entry in the table in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki |
debfc1f
to
bd0da6f
Compare
updated:
|
Draft for p2sh multisig wallet structure
Discussion: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05156.html