Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename testrand functions to have test in name #827

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2020

Conversation

sipa
Copy link
Contributor

@sipa sipa commented Sep 26, 2020

Suggested here: #808 (comment)

@real-or-random
Copy link
Contributor

ACK a45c1fa diff looks good

@gmaxwell
Copy link
Contributor

utACK

@elichai
Copy link
Contributor

elichai commented Sep 26, 2020

utACK a45c1fa

@real-or-random
Copy link
Contributor

Urghs, Travis failed. I'll restart it.

I believe what happened here is: The travis build was started with before #821 was merged, with the travis matrix (with the env variables) taken from before #821. Then #821 was merged while the travis build was running. The valgrind jobs, which ran late, then merged this PR with the new master after #821, which has a new travis.sh file...

@real-or-random real-or-random merged commit 63150ab into bitcoin-core:master Sep 27, 2020
jasonbcox pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2020
Summary: This is a backport of secp256k1 [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#827 | PR827]]

Test Plan:
  ninja check-secp256k1

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D7669
deadalnix pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/secp256k1 that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2020
Summary: This is a backport of secp256k1 [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#827 | PR827]]

Test Plan:
  ninja check-secp256k1

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D7669
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants