Fee reimbursement: Trade BCGDKWC 2x

[Sylo44]

Tried to start a trade and got 2x Timeout errors:

Report here: bisq-network/bisq#1725 (comment)

trade 1
http://prntscr.com/kyqwo5
d4cf65a2ae7f4b9ea684b5c3b3283a944d408e008d5e5fedb0e7fcf49a1de80d
51513e1a3e6ed1dcb47e27e6f5c058513e7d674bd3ec5d0419964d2b3c94e018

trade2
http://prntscr.com/kyqwt0
d4cf65a2ae7f4b9ea684b5c3b3283a944d408e008d5e5fedb0e7fcf49a1de80d
8ed04f81ed2c103e31407a5e08e11ae6793505cabbb929c93a63bb684cb4983f

Thank you!

[Sylo44]

is there gonna be a notification about the reimursement so I know when it was payed back? @ManfredKarrer

[ManfredKarrer]

One of the arbitrators will do it here and I assume they will put a notification to all.

[KanoczTomas]

All transactions are on the blockchain, yet the screenshot shows only one per each trade was successful. @cbeams I need your guidance here how to proceed. Which transactions to reimburse?

[Sylo44]

I'm not sure if I understand correctly. Maybe you have some way to contact you in realtime to discuss this? Otherwise elt me try to give more information about the failed trades:

2 trades failed, although I think its strange that both got the same ID:
http://prntscr.com/l6rqxi

I'm gonna call the trade on top TX1 and the one on the bottom TX2:

TX1:
http://prntscr.com/l6rqxi

transactionIDs as seen in screenshot:
Ersteller: d4cf65a2ae7f4b9ea684b5c3b3283a944d408e008d5e5fedb0e7fcf49a1de80d
Abnehmer: 8ed04f81ed2c103e31407a5e08e11ae6793505cabbb929c93a63bb684cb4983f

TX2:
http://prntscr.com/l6rs3o

tansactionIDs:
Ersteller: d4cf65a2ae7f4b9ea684b5c3b3283a944d408e008d5e5fedb0e7fcf49a1de80d
Abnehmer: 51513e1a3e6ed1dcb47e27e6f5c058513e7d674bd3ec5d0419964d2b3c94e018

which is kind of weird I guess?
Ersteller Transaction ID seems to be the same both times, but "Abnehmer"-ID is different in both failed transactions.

Hope this help, otherwise I would appreciate a method where we could talk in ealtime about it, telegram, whatsapp or similar.

Thank you

[cbeams]

Closing as reimbursed via the batch transaction documented at #101 (comment).