Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Establish critical bugs board and process #16

Closed
14 tasks done
cbeams opened this issue Feb 17, 2020 · 13 comments
Closed
14 tasks done

Establish critical bugs board and process #16

cbeams opened this issue Feb 17, 2020 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
to:Improve Reliability to:Improve Support was:delivered bisq.wiki/Project_management#Closing_as_delivered

Comments

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Feb 17, 2020

Board: https://github.com/orgs/bisq-network/projects/11

@cbeams cbeams transferred this issue from bisq-network/proposals Feb 17, 2020
@ripcurlx
Copy link

  • @ripcurlx to go through spreadsheet and add critical bugs to the new board
  • @ripcurlx to transcribe any notes and linked issues from the spreadsheet to the actual critical bug

@leo816
Copy link

leo816 commented Feb 19, 2020

  • @leo816 to work with @ripcurlx to make sure critical bugs listed in private support spreadsheet are reflected on the new board

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Feb 20, 2020

@ripcurlx, now that the Critical Bugs board is in place and populated, we're getting close to this project being complete. What remains is to document and announce the board and its process. To that end, I've created a stub at https://bisq.wiki/Critical_Bugs. Would you be willing to flesh it out? If so, please create an admin task, assign it to yourself and reference it here, thanks.

You'll see that I've also created stubs for the Dev Team and the larger Development Process of which the Critical Bugs board/process are a part. Wiki links should connect all of them (and mostly already do).

@ripcurlx
Copy link

@ripcurlx
Copy link

@ripcurlx
Copy link

@cbeams Do you want to close this issue after your wiki edits?

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Feb 21, 2020 via email

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Feb 21, 2020

@cbeams Do you want to close this issue after your wiki edits?

yes, will do

Actually, this project shouldn't be considered complete until the board and process are linked to from the places that (especially new) developers would look to as a reference on our development process. I've added checkboxes in the description to this effect. I would be fine if these links are surgically added in a rough / quick way. We should more fully revise and unify the resources mentioned there, but that's a separate effort.

As an aside, this is a good example of end-to-end thinking when it comes to projects / what it means to really deliver something. We created the board, documented the process and announced it to @bisq-network/dev and @bisq-network/support, but without the links mentioned above, it's likely that future developers won't know about the board/process unless someone mentions it to them.

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Feb 21, 2020

Ok, I've updated the description to reflect recent proliferation of links to the critical bugs article in all the right places. We're just waiting on the two PRs to be merged, and I think we can consider this project delivered.

@ripcurlx
Copy link

Ok, I've updated the description to reflect recent proliferation of links to the critical bugs article in all the right places. We're just waiting on the two PRs to be merged, and I think we can consider this project delivered.

Both PRs were merged: Seems to be a very active maintainer 😉

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Feb 21, 2020

Please actually check boxes in the description when you complete them, thanks. It's also OK to re-post them as comments as has been done above here, but the only essential thing is to check the boxes in the description and add a comment saying you've done so. Thanks.

@cbeams cbeams added the was:delivered bisq.wiki/Project_management#Closing_as_delivered label Feb 24, 2020
@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Feb 24, 2020

I just want to note here that this is our first delivered project under the new proposed project management infrastructure at #1. When we put together the first review meeting, we can go over this as an example.

I've just labeled the project as was:delivered accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
to:Improve Reliability to:Improve Support was:delivered bisq.wiki/Project_management#Closing_as_delivered
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants