-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For May 2018 #78
Comments
Update: bisq-network/roles#71 is actually merged now, and it's fine to include it in this compensation request (please update the issue description accordingly, @rex4539). It was my bad as the Roles Maintainer that I didn't see and merge this earlier. Thanks. |
Also, @rex4539, it's very interesting how you approached valuing your work here. It's clear that you valued each typo fixed at 10 BSQ (and 1 BSQ is currently valued at 1 USD during Phase Zero). For the benefit of stakeholders voting during this round, and also for the benefit of future contributors who may submit compensation requests for similar work, could you please describe your rationale for this valuation, i.e. why 10 BSQ per typo and not 5 or 15? Thanks, and thanks again for the work! |
@cbeams I just thought it is a fair compensation for the work performed. Especially the typo fixes required A LOT of work, I can assure you :) But if anyone thinks it's too much, we can discuss it. I'm totally open. |
Closing as complete, see #70 (comment). |
I just checked the DAO tab in the Bisq client and I still have 0 BSQ. Was my compensation request rejected? |
The BSQ is not distributed yet: See https://docs.bisq.network/dao/phase-zero.html |
Summary
Contributions delivered
350 BSQ. Went through the whole repo and fixed 35 typos in 10 files.
320 BSQ. Went through the whole repo and fixed 32 typos in 15 files.
340 BSQ. Went through the whole repo and fixed 34 typos in 10 files.
270 BSQ. Went through the whole repo and fixed 27 typos in 17 files.
40 BSQ. Went through the whole repo and fixed 4 typos in 4 files.
50 BSQ. Reviewed and left valuable feedback that was accepted and helped merge the pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: