Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 9 #459

Closed
stejbac opened this issue Jan 12, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

For Cycle 9 #459

stejbac opened this issue Jan 12, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@stejbac
Copy link

stejbac commented Jan 12, 2020

Summary

Specify the total amount of BSQ you are requesting:

  • BSQ requested: 1250 / 0.79 + 1700 / 0.81 + 2000 / 0.67 = 6666.12 BSQ

Contributions delivered

Provide links to contributions you have delivered, the amount of BSQ you are requesting for each, and any comments that will help stakeholders understand its value.

I missed the Cycle 7 and 8 deadlines for the following PRs:

I missed the Cycle 8 deadline for the following PRs:

Merged PRs for Cycle 9:

Other work (meant for Cycle 8 but missed):

Contributions in progress

Provide links to work you're involved with that is still in progress. This section is optional, and is for your own benefit in keeping track of what you're doing and keeping other contributors up to date with the same.

Roles performed

Provide links to your monthly report on any roles you are responsible for.

@stejbac stejbac changed the title [WIP] For Cycle 9 For Cycle 9 Jan 13, 2020
@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Jan 17, 2020

@stejbac, this has been my first chance to review some of your work, and I just want to say it was a pleasure looking through your pull requests, commit comments and code changes. Keep going!

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Jan 17, 2020

Having a second look at this, I realize I overlooked this line item:

That seems a bit much to me. Can you explain why you valued it so highly?

I will still vote to approve this request, but under the budget we'll roll out in Cycle 10, pure refactoring like this probably wouldn't get green lit at such a price.

@stejbac
Copy link
Author

stejbac commented Jan 18, 2020

It was mainly because it affected a lot of files and took me quite a while (about 5 days), since I tried to cover the bulk of the codebase and some of the unchecked operations were not all that straightforward to replace.

I intended to include the item in Cycle 8 but missed the submission in the app (as I left it until very late, forgetting that blocks come randomly). So I just carried forward all the BSQ/dollar requests meant for Cycles 7 & 8 (at which time I was unaware of the new policy).

In future, I'll try to avoid making pure refactoring PRs and try to do them along the way instead.

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Jan 21, 2020

Closed as accepted.

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Jan 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants