-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update data stores for v1.9.15 #7035
Update data stores for v1.9.15 #7035
Conversation
@alvasw @HenrikJannsen @jmacxx Could anyone of you ACK this PR? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please also consider setting PROPOSAL_412_ACTIVATION_DATE
which should be set to a few weeks after release date. See bisq-network/proposals#412 (comment)
As both traders need to have the exact same distribution for the delayed payout transaction we would need to roll that change out with a activation blockheight sufficiently far in the future so that we can be sure to release and enforce the updated version.
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ public class Version { | |||
*/ | |||
public static final List<String> HISTORICAL_RESOURCE_FILE_VERSION_TAGS = Arrays.asList("1.4.0", "1.5.0", "1.5.2", | |||
"1.5.5", "1.5.7", "1.6.0", "1.6.3", "1.6.5", "1.7.2", "1.7.4", "1.8.0", "1.8.1", "1.8.3", "1.9.0", "1.9.3", | |||
"1.9.5", "1.9.6", "1.9.7", "1.9.10", "1.9.11", "1.9.13"); | |||
"1.9.5", "1.9.6", "1.9.7", "1.9.10", "1.9.11", "1.9.13", "1.9.15"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
VERSION = "1.9.15"
HISTORICAL...TAGS
would have 1.9.14 (the prior version) appended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is correct! 1.9.14 was a hotfix release without data store updates.
I can confirm that my hashes on a light node are the same. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
DAO hashes match with my nodes too.
Light node in light mode and full node in dark mode