Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply code review suggestions to seednode changes #6454

Conversation

HenrikJannsen
Copy link
Collaborator

Apply suggestions from #6432 (comment)

Remove setter of key.

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <[email protected]>
Use executor at httpClient builder.
Use httpClient.sendAsync.
Add keep-alive header.
Add RejectedExecutionHandler.

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <[email protected]>
I want to avoid to risk changes with not calling error handlers/listeners in those cases
as not 100% sure if that could have unintended effects.

Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: HenrikJannsen <[email protected]>
@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@HenrikJannsen Should this be included in v1.9.7?

@ripcurlx ripcurlx added this to the v1.9.7 milestone Dec 12, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@alvasw alvasw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Hi @HenrikJannsen !
I looked over your changes and looks good to me. I saw you moved the ReportingItems to the seednode package. Good job!

Copy link
Contributor

@ripcurlx ripcurlx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK - based on #6454 (review)

@ripcurlx ripcurlx merged commit ac575ce into bisq-network:master Dec 12, 2022
@HenrikJannsen HenrikJannsen deleted the apply_code_review_suggestions_to_seednode_changes branch December 14, 2022 20:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants