Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add fiat equivalent for Total Amount & Security Deposit for both makers and sellers #5452

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 4, 2021

Conversation

BtcContributor
Copy link
Contributor

Now the recap of the trade displays also the fiat equivalent for Total Amount & Security Deposit for both makers and sellers.

Fix also the Total Amount displayed as a taker of a Sell btc trade when using bsq as trading fees (Bsq was not displayed in Total Amount).

Maker, btc trading fee, previously
maker_btc_old

Maker, btc trading fee, now
maker_btc_new

Taker, btc trading fee, previously
taker_btc_old

Taker, btc trading fee, now
taker_btc_new

Maker, bsq trading fee, previously
maker_bsq_old

Maker, bsq trading fee, now
maker_bsq_new

Taker, bsq trading fee, previously -> THIS IS INCORRECT AS BSQ TRADING FEES ARE NOT DISPLAYED IN TOTAL AMOUNT
taker_bsq_old

Taker, bsq trading fee, now
taker_bsq_new

When security deposit is not the minimum for example, this is how it looks like:

percentage

Copy link
Contributor

@ripcurlx ripcurlx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 👍

@ripcurlx ripcurlx merged commit 31b7bd1 into bisq-network:master May 4, 2021
@ripcurlx ripcurlx added this to the v1.6.4 milestone May 4, 2021
@BtcContributor BtcContributor deleted the addfiatequivalent branch May 6, 2021 11:57
@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@BtcContributor I just started with release testing and recognized that for BSQ the fiat amount is not displayed as described above. Please see
Bildschirmfoto 2021-05-26 um 10 51 15
Bildschirmfoto 2021-05-26 um 10 52 57

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants