Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove redundant DisputeAgentType enum #4595

Merged

Conversation

ghubstan
Copy link
Contributor

@ghubstan ghubstan commented Oct 3, 2020

Use existing SupportType enum instead, and map the valid CLI registerdisputeagent method's dispute-agent-type parameter names to SupportType.

Adjusted affected tests.

Use existing SupportType enum instead, and map the valid api
'registerdisputeagent' method's dispute-agent-type parameter
names to SupportType.
@ghubstan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ghubstan commented Oct 3, 2020

It was decided to ignore this PR's Switch statements should have a default label codacy complaint.

chimp1984
chimp1984 previously approved these changes Oct 4, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@chimp1984 chimp1984 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

ripcurlx commented Oct 6, 2020

It was decided to ignore this PR's Switch statements should have a default label codacy complaint.

I removed the pattern.

Copy link
Contributor

@ripcurlx ripcurlx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK based on #4595 (review)

Copy link
Contributor

@ripcurlx ripcurlx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK based on #4595 (review)

@ripcurlx ripcurlx merged commit 7d14ff3 into bisq-network:master Oct 7, 2020
@ghubstan ghubstan deleted the remove-duplicated-supporttype-enum branch October 7, 2020 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants