-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove analytics operator bond requirement #3232
Remove analytics operator bond requirement #3232
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NACK
Changing those values was never tested well in the DAO and its pretty complex to test.
@chimp1984 since the analytics operator role hasn't been released in any version of Bisq yet, it should be safe 😅 |
utACK - As long as it wasn't used nor released I think it should be quite safe to change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Please revert! It is risky to change that even if it was not used. Breaking DAO consensus can have severe effects and that change does not justify the risk. |
I have to agree with @chimp1984 on this one. It seems like a very small benefit compared to the risk of breaking the DAO consensus. |
@m52go yeah I spoke with the Chimp and he said that while the changes we made are probably fine, even if there's a 0.1% risk of breaking the DAO, we shouldn't do it without huge testing, which is a valid point, so we're going to revert the changes and remove the bond requirement for now. |
As discussed in:
bisq-network/proposals#115 (comment)