Add not_notable
to CurationRelevance vocabulary for semi-automated curation workflow
#1236
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds the
not_notable
tag to the CurationRelevance vocabulary as a way to mark papers that are relevant for machine learning training but do not meet the threshold for inclusion in the Bioregistry.While curating papers, there have been a few instances of entries that provide new identifier information but aren't notable enough, or well-maintained enough for inclusion in the bioregistry (#1225). Rather than curating these as subpar prefixes, tagging them as
not_notable
allows us to retain them as positive training samples without cluttering the bioregistry with less impactful entries.