Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add Financial Contributions section to GOVERNANCE #2693
chore: add Financial Contributions section to GOVERNANCE #2693
Changes from 6 commits
50cee22
f55be27
e1774c4
96828a4
0e12fce
e29717d
8fae8c8
dddc81a
13134d5
70607e6
4b6b03b
8bfb879
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a personal preference, but I don't like the term "Bounty". I am more keen to use the term "project" or "issue":
As far as I've seen out there, bounties are just for "small" things that contributors can easily achieve.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if there's a better alternative, but the words "issue" and "project" are already used for units of work, which may or may not be funded. The word "bounty" unambiguously clarifies there's a financial reward for a unit of work. The Polar terminology makes sense within their realm, since the platform is all about funding, so they differentiate "issues" from other financial transactions, but applying that terminology to Biome would be more confusing than helpful, I think.
I don't think there's an implication that bounties should only be for small things. That should be reflected in the pledged amount instead. But I do think issues with a bounty attached shouldn't become too big, hence the $1000 maximum. If a task is so large we feel $1000 doesn't cover the effort, it would be better to split it into multiple tasks with separate bounties.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Community-funded issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can change the header, yes. But the word bounty is used all-over the place in this doc, and using the full phrase "Community-funded issue" everywhere seems quite burdensome. Assuming we don't want to ban the word bounty altogether, I'm not a fan of changing the header either, since it would only create a disconnect between the terminology used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you know if 70/30 is the usual amount for bounties?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be honest, I don't. I would be leaning to either 70/30 or 80/20, but it's hard to say which should be preferred. And the range as a whole is more a gut-feeling than anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can add a new phrase saying that we reserve the right to change the percentage based on the amount of time Maintainers and Core contributors would need to spend coaching the contributors and reviewing the PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple of things:
#bounties
to#funding
. A broader channel, so we can also chat about sponsorships and suchThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All done, except the last point: I wonder if/hope it might be sufficient for now to let core contributors make these decisions at their own discretion, as long as it fits within the rest of the rules as stated in this document. Do we think a poll is necessary for each bounty request?