Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parm v0.0.7 #52182

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Parm v0.0.7 #52182

merged 13 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

vhfsantos
Copy link
Contributor

What's Changed

Some important changes in the parm train task:

  • Add the column name of the measurement data as an argument: now, the user needs to specify which input data column should be used for training.
  • Make the model weight file be named as the cell type: before, the output model was always called model.parm. Now, it is automatically set to the name of the cell type set by the user.

Small changes:

  • Apply attribution_range also to importance track, not only for the matrix
  • improve log messages and hide the progress bar for stdout

Full Changelog: vansteensellab/PARM@v0.0.6...v0.0.7

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the meta.yaml file for the parm package. The primary changes include an increment in the package version from "0.0.6" to "0.0.7" and a corresponding update of the SHA256 checksum. The previous SHA256 hash, "58853578e42e76ecb9e609cb9b292fa979ae5a999d28126f3c43ac0e986f44a5," has been replaced with a new hash, "5f6a94d86ba026ac816eae8e27fbec00d2b25a7c5f5729101474f758d7dcbcc9." Additionally, the build number has been modified from 2 to 0. These modifications reflect updates in the package's versioning and integrity verification details.

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@vhfsantos has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b483a24 and 084c6ff.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/parm/meta.yaml (1)

Line range hint 38-39: Enhance test coverage for new features

The current test only verifies the help command. Consider adding tests to verify the new required column name argument functionality.

 test:
   commands:
     - parm train --help
+    - parm train --help | grep -q "column-name"  # Verify new argument is documented
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b483a24 and 084c6ff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/parm/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/parm/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/parm/meta.yaml (3)

13-13: LGTM: Build number reset

Correctly reset build number to 0 for the new version.


1-2: Verify version and SHA256 checksum

The version bump to 0.0.7 matches the PR title. Let's verify the SHA256 checksum matches the GitHub release.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


Line range hint 21-36: Verify dependencies for new features

The dependencies list includes all required packages for the new features (pandas for column operations, tqdm for progress bars). However, let's verify if any new dependencies were added in the upstream repository for v0.0.7.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information by checking the dependencies in the repository's documentation.


Let me check the repository's documentation specifically for PARM to get more information about dependencies.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Dependencies are correctly specified and sufficient for new features

The dependencies listed in meta.yaml are comprehensive and align with the package requirements:

  • All core dependencies for the new features are present (pandas for column operations, tqdm for progress bars)
  • The upstream setup.py only specifies 'torchsummary' as it relies on conda environment for other dependencies
  • The version requirements (numpy >=1.26.0) are appropriate and match the latest package versions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for dependency changes in setup.py between versions
# Expected: Dependencies should match between meta.yaml and upstream

# Get setup.py from new version
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vansteensellab/PARM/v0.0.7/setup.py

# Compare with previous version
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vansteensellab/PARM/v0.0.6/setup.py

Length of output: 1432


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check dependencies in README and documentation
fd "README.md|requirements.txt" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 4484


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check PARM's documentation
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vansteensellab/PARM/v0.0.7/README.md

Length of output: 5059

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

@mencian mencian merged commit 093e4cc into bioconda:master Nov 19, 2024
6 checks passed
@mencian mencian mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants