Update seqspec to 0.3.0 #51805
Update seqspec to 0.3.0 #51805
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new metadata file named Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/seqspec/meta.yaml (1)
35-42: Consider enhancing test coverage
While the current tests cover basic functionality, consider adding:
- Tests for other CLI commands beyond just version
- Import tests for main submodules
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/seqspec/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/seqspec/meta.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/seqspec/meta.yaml (3)
12-19: LGTM! Build configuration follows best practices
The build configuration is well-structured with appropriate:
- Version pinning using run_exports
- Entry point definition
- noarch Python specification
- Build isolation settings
44-52: LGTM! Package information is complete
The about section provides all necessary metadata including homepage, license, and a clear description of the package's purpose.
21-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding version constraints and updating Python requirement
While the dependencies look correct, consider:
- Adding version constraints for dependencies like jsonschema, python-newick, requests, and biopython to prevent compatibility issues
- Reviewing if Python >=3.6 is still appropriate, as Python 3.6 is EOL
| {% set name = "seqspec" %} | ||
| {% set version = "0.3.0" %} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version mismatch with PR objective
The PR aims to update seqspec to 0.3.1, but the version is set to 0.3.0 in the recipe.
Apply this diff to update the version:
{% set name = "seqspec" %}
-{% set version = "0.3.0" %}
+{% set version = "0.3.1" %}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {% set name = "seqspec" %} | |
| {% set version = "0.3.0" %} | |
| {% set name = "seqspec" %} | |
| {% set version = "0.3.1" %} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| url: https://pypi.org/packages/source/{{ name[0] }}/{{ name }}/seqspec-{{ version }}.tar.gz | ||
| sha256: d9e6c283daaca06f58f1090c0c7dcfecf646b9658e62aa873a4e85fef56c56c9 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
SHA256 checksum needs to be updated to match PyPI
The current checksum in meta.yaml (d9e6c283daaca06f58f1090c0c7dcfecf646b9658e62aa873a4e85fef56c56c9) does not match the official PyPI checksum for seqspec 0.3.1 (1c71201e3913526542f4fe7dfcbc866a295976e983dc91c7f53efb655797b3c2).
Please update the checksum in the recipe to match the official one from PyPI.
🔗 Analysis chain
Update SHA256 checksum for version 0.3.1
The SHA256 checksum needs to be updated to match the new version 0.3.1 of the package.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the checksum for seqspec 0.3.1 from PyPI
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/seqspec/0.3.1/json | jq -r '.urls[] | select(.packagetype=="sdist") | .digests.sha256'
Length of output: 183
|
@BiocondaBot please add label |
bumbps version of seqspec to 0.3.0
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.