Add coptr #51764
Add coptr #51764
Conversation
|
@BiocondaBot Please add label |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new file named Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/coptr/meta.yaml (1)
34-41: Consider enhancing test coverage.
While basic testing is present, consider adding more comprehensive tests:
- Test basic functionality with a small example
- Verify version command works:
coptr --version
test:
imports:
- coptr
commands:
- pip check
- coptr --help
+ - coptr --version
requires:
- pip📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/coptr/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/coptr/meta.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/coptr/meta.yaml (5)
1-6: LGTM! Package metadata is well-structured.
The package name and version are properly defined using Jinja2 variables, following conda-forge best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
12-19: LGTM! Build configuration follows best practices.
The build section is well-configured with:
- Proper entry point definition
- Appropriate use of noarch: python
- Correct implementation of run_exports for version pinning
43-51: LGTM! Package metadata is complete and appropriate.
The about section properly defines:
- License information with license file
- Relevant biological application in summary
- Appropriate maintainer configuration
8-10: Verify PyPI package URL and checksum.
The source configuration looks correct, but let's verify the package availability and checksum.
21-32: Consider adding run_exports for critical dependencies.
While the dependencies are well-defined, consider whether numpy, pysam, or scipy should use run_exports to prevent ABI incompatibilities.
Describe your pull request here
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.