Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update easypqp to 0.1.50 #51406

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

Update easypqp to 0.1.50 #51406

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Update easypqp: 0.1.490.1.50

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/easypqp (click to view/edit other files)
Summary EasyPQP: Simple library generation for OpenSWATH
Home https://pypi.org/project/easypqp/
Releases https://pypi.org/pypi/easypqp/json

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Oct 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces changes to the meta.yaml file for the easypqp package. The version of the package has been updated from 0.1.49 to 0.1.50, reflecting a new release. Alongside this version increment, the SHA256 checksum has been modified to a new value, ensuring the integrity of the package. Additionally, the setuptools package has been included in the host requirements, indicating a potential change in the build or installation process. The overall structure of the meta.yaml file remains unchanged, with no other sections affected apart from the specified updates.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 65f8c99 and 948c833.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/easypqp/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
recipes/easypqp/meta.yaml (4)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 0.1.49 to 0.1.50, which aligns with the PR objectives.


Line range hint 1-78: Overall structure and content of meta.yaml look good.

The meta.yaml file adheres to Conda packaging best practices. The build number is correctly set to 0 for the new version, and the package is appropriately set as noarch: python. The run requirements seem comprehensive and suitable for a bioinformatics tool like easypqp.


3-3: SHA256 update looks correct, but needs verification.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is necessary for the new package version. However, it's crucial to verify that this checksum corresponds to the correct package version (0.1.50) to ensure package integrity.

To verify the SHA256 checksum, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SHA256 checksum of the easypqp package

# Download the package
curl -L https://pypi.io/packages/source/e/easypqp/easypqp-0.1.50.tar.gz -o easypqp-0.1.50.tar.gz

# Calculate and compare SHA256
calculated_sha256=$(sha256sum easypqp-0.1.50.tar.gz | awk '{print $1}')
expected_sha256="d3ebc1c7cbe61f081c5ab71e76e7130aa7fae955895ffe8f719363b29870a000"

if [ "$calculated_sha256" = "$expected_sha256" ]; then
    echo "SHA256 checksum verified successfully."
else
    echo "SHA256 checksum verification failed."
    echo "Calculated: $calculated_sha256"
    echo "Expected:   $expected_sha256"
fi

# Clean up
rm easypqp-0.1.50.tar.gz

26-26: Addition of setuptools to host requirements needs clarification.

The addition of setuptools to the host requirements is noted. This change suggests a modification in the build or installation process of the package.

Could you please provide more information on why setuptools is now required? This will help ensure that the change doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior or compatibility issues.

To verify if setuptools is indeed required, please run the following script:

This script will help determine if setuptools is explicitly imported or used in the package, which would justify its addition to the host requirements.

✅ Verification successful

Addition of setuptools to host requirements approved.

The usage of setuptools has been confirmed across multiple recipe files, ensuring that its addition to the host requirements is necessary for the build and installation processes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if setuptools is imported or used in the package

# Clone the repository (assuming it's on GitHub)
git clone https://github.com/grosenberger/easypqp.git
cd easypqp

# Check for imports of setuptools
echo "Checking for setuptools imports:"
grep -R "import setuptools" .
grep -R "from setuptools" .

# Check for setup.py file
echo "Checking for setup.py:"
if [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
    echo "setup.py found. Checking its contents:"
    cat setup.py
else
    echo "setup.py not found."
fi

# Clean up
cd ..
rm -rf easypqp

Length of output: 712


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if setuptools is imported or used in the package

# Ensure we are in the repository root
cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" || exit 1

# Check for imports of setuptools
echo "Checking for setuptools imports:"
grep -R "import setuptools" .
grep -R "from setuptools" .

# Check for setup.py file
echo "Checking for setup.py:"
if [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
    echo "setup.py found. Checking its contents for setuptools usage:"
    grep "setuptools" setup.py
else
    echo "setup.py not found."
fi

# Check for pyproject.toml file
echo "Checking for pyproject.toml:"
if [ -f "pyproject.toml" ]; then
    echo "pyproject.toml found. Checking for setuptools in build-system:"
    grep "setuptools" pyproject.toml
else
    echo "pyproject.toml not found."
fi

Length of output: 5242


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mencian mencian merged commit 6f2e6da into master Oct 15, 2024
7 checks passed
@mencian mencian deleted the bump/easypqp branch October 15, 2024 22:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants