Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gempipe to 1.35.4 #51330

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Update gempipe to 1.35.4 #51330

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Update gempipe: 1.35.31.35.4

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/gempipe (click to view/edit other files)
Summary gempipe is a tool for the reconstruction of strain-specific genome-scale metabolic models.
Home https://github.com/lazzarigioele/gempipe
Releases https://github.com/lazzarigioele/gempipe/tags
Recipe Maintainer(s) @lazzarigioele
Author @lazzarigioele

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Oct 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves an update to the meta.yaml file for the gempipe package. The version number has been incremented from "1.35.3" to "1.35.4". This change includes an updated source URL that now points to the new version's tarball, changing from v1.35.3 to v1.35.4. Additionally, the SHA256 checksum has been revised to correspond with the new version, changing from 98652ae059cb2ef582e3ec7d1d4c217ff3c061fcbc758acf0bc1a1e8616a18c0 to 10bb83284848f8c21baa4069150e65e5a092771b5c5b6396d1e58c33431960a1. No other modifications to the structure or content of the file have been made.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update gempipe to 1.35.3 #51008: This PR updates the gempipe package from version 1.35.2 to 1.35.3, which is directly related to the main PR that updates gempipe from 1.35.3 to 1.35.4, indicating a sequential versioning change.

Suggested reviewers

  • martin-g: Suggested reviewer for this update.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74bb24f and 3701bcd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/gempipe/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/gempipe/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mencian mencian merged commit 6596d00 into master Oct 11, 2024
7 checks passed
@mencian mencian deleted the bump/gempipe branch October 11, 2024 15:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants