-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hopla: bump pandoc #50978
Hopla: bump pandoc #50978
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ source: | |
sha256: {{ hash }} | ||
|
||
build: | ||
number: 0 | ||
number: 1 | ||
noarch: generic | ||
run_exports: | ||
- {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }} | ||
martin-g marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
requirements: | ||
run: | ||
|
@@ -26,7 +28,7 @@ requirements: | |
- bioconductor-genomicranges >=1.42.0 | ||
- bioconductor-dnacopy >=1.64.0 | ||
- merlin 1.1.2.* # [not osx] | ||
- pandoc >=2.* | ||
- pandoc >=3.1.5 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codebase verification Pandoc version update introduces compatibility issues with certain recipes. The update of pandoc to 🔗 Analysis chainPandoc version update addresses memory leak but may cause compatibility issues. Updating pandoc to A previous analysis identified at least one recipe ( Please review the results of this script and consider the following options:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other recipes that depend on pandoc and their version requirements
# Search for pandoc dependencies in other recipe files
rg --type yaml 'pandoc' recipes/ | grep -v 'recipes/hopla/meta.yaml'
Length of output: 2247 |
||
|
||
test: | ||
commands: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clarification needed on run_exports addition.
The addition of
run_exports
is generally beneficial for maintaining compatibility with downstream recipes. However, there are some concerns with the current implementation:run_exports
refers to "myrecipe".run_exports
.Please clarify:
run_exports
intentional for this PR?{{ pin_subpackage("hopla", max_pin="x") }}
instead of{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
?run_exports
section.