-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] Clarify mask/dseg/probseg in common derivatives #489
Merged
effigies
merged 6 commits into
bids-standard:common-derivatives
from
effigies:enh/no_binary_dseg
Jun 1, 2020
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9eca762
ENH: Change single ROI binary image suffix from dseg to mask
effigies 8afb695
Improve wording
effigies d820af2
Clarify discrete surface segmentations
effigies a3a8d69
Swap mapping/color and add an example dseg with new labels
effigies 0f3d9ab
Replace "tissue class" with more general "anatomical structure"
effigies a7f22b2
Add labels for masks
effigies File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the concept of segmentation is valid for 1D signals too. I'm fine having all of this under imaging for practical reasons (i.e., finalize a first release of derivatives), but the definition could/should be general (IMHO).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find this suggestion really hard to parse.
Are there examples of 1D signals that will be segmented in neuroimaging that really motivates this? I can try to offer some wording that would cover those cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Epilepsy EEG markup where there are multiple different seizure types? This is coming from no familiarity with EEG BIDS whatsoever; it just came to mind.
Another might be a discrete fixel-based parcellation; but whether such data are 1D or 4D is a matter of perspective 🙃