_mod entity: should it be kept, dissolved, transformed, or embraced? #70
Labels
consistency
Aspect requiring special treatment/logic outside of generic common principles
entities
Changes to entities.
_mod
was introduced and is used primarily to disambiguate different_defacemask
s. So, to a degree, it encapsulates the semantic that some, but not all,_suffix
es correspond toMRI modalities
(really) as a summarized in a comment to #58.It is only present only when there is a
_defacemask
and only foranat/
, while in effect most of the time corresponding to thosesuffix
es "implicitly" where suffix does correspond to "contrast" (not modality really).Samples from openneuro
Also there is
where the point of having
_mod
is coming up. And as we are planing to proceed withif we get an entity
_mod
which actually corresponds to modality (mri
,eeg
, ...) not just mere contrast, it somewhat makes it then explicit and consistent to then "embrace" that entity and use it consistently to disambiguate all files, not just_defacemask
s.Note: if to be kept just for the sake of disambiguation of some
_suffix2
(e.g._defacemask
) among different_suffix
es (e.g._T1w
and_T2w
) as it is now, yet another use is_events.tsv
files which came up in the context ofThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: