Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

use AutoNoVsync in stress tests #9229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2023
Merged

use AutoNoVsync in stress tests #9229

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2023

Conversation

mockersf
Copy link
Member

Objective

  • Some stress tests use Immediate which is not supported everywhere

Solution

  • Use AutoNoVsync instead

@mockersf mockersf added the C-Examples An addition or correction to our examples label Jul 21, 2023
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added the S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it label Jul 21, 2023
@mockersf mockersf added this to the 0.11.1 milestone Jul 21, 2023
@mockersf
Copy link
Member Author

putting in 0.11.1 as it would fix those examples on the website

@mockersf mockersf added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 21, 2023
Merged via the queue into bevyengine:main with commit eb485b1 Jul 21, 2023
cart pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
@mockersf @cart
use AutoNoVsync in stress tests (#9229)
ac4e729 
# Objective

- Some stress tests use `Immediate` which is not supported everywhere

## Solution

- Use `AutoNoVsync` instead
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile approved these changes

@Elabajaba Elabajaba Elabajaba approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-Examples An addition or correction to our examples S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.11.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@mockersf @Elabajaba @alice-i-cecile