Scientific publications are too dry. Too much math, too little emotions. Science needs emojis! Leave a small heart to value the hard work gone into a paper (Smith, 2014 ❤️ ). Flag self-citations as in (Sixt et al., 2019 🤳) Finally, you can express what you truly think directly as in (Wakefield et. al, 1998 🤦). We could also indicate, how thoroughly we read papers (Van Wesel et al., 2014 🙈)
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{emojicite}
\setcitestyle{authoryear, round}
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\begin{document}
\emojicitep{einstein, kissing-heart}
\bibliography{bibliography}
\end{document}
See example.tex for basic usage.
Table 1: How did you liked the cited work?
Citation | Emoji | Description |
---|---|---|
(Einstein, 1905 😘) | kissing-heart | I like this work. Here is a kiss. |
(Shannon, 1948 🙇) | bow | Wow, I can only bow to this work. |
(Kim et al., 2017 👍) | +1 | Good work! |
(Zhang and Cheok, 2016 😕 ) | confused | I am confused by this work. |
(Le Cun et al., 1989 🥱) | yawning-face | Boring work. |
(Tishby and Zaslavsky, 2015 🤨) | raised-eyebrow | I have some serious questions... |
(Wakefield et al., 1998 🤦) | facepalm | omg, this work sucks! |
Table 2: How thoroughly have you read the work?
Citation | Emoji | Description |
---|---|---|
(Kingma and Welling, 2013 🤓) | nerd-face | I know everything about this work. |
(Kim et al., 2017 🎓) | graduation-cap | I know this work well. |
(Shannon, 1948 🤔) | thinking | I read it but I still have questions. |
(Jones, 1972 🙈) | see-no-evil | Ups, I did not read this work in-depth. |
(Einstein, 1905 🤷) | shrug | too long; did not read |
See PDF Docu for more examples.
The package requires the Tex Live 2020 distributon and you need to use lualatex.
If you use the latexmk
tool, simple use latexmk -pdflua
. See the
emoji package for are in-depth
description on the requirements.
Copyright (C) 2020 by Leon Sixt, License LPPL 1.3c
🙏 to Xiangdong Zeng creator of emoji