-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove arguments from perform method #140
Remove arguments from perform method #140
Conversation
The linter fails because code uses Ruby 2.5 syntax and Rubocop is set to lint against 2.4 (the same as in gemspec https://github.com/bensheldon/good_job/blob/main/good_job.gemspec#L48) but there are no tests for Ruby 2.4. |
@morgoth Oof, sorry you got bitten by that inconsistency. Let's drop support for Ruby 2.4; it looks like Ruby 2.4 EOLed on March 31, 2020. Could you please remove the references to 2.4, and change the Linter config to 2.5 as its own PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is fantastic! 🙌
I left some feedback on the tests, specifically to use RSpec message stubs instead of manually setting and resetting global values. I have to apologize (and express my gratitude to you for working in them) because those tests could be more exemplary.
Once you fix the linter issue, and make the changes to the tests, this is ready to go 👍
spec/lib/good_job/job_spec.rb
Outdated
@@ -204,11 +204,16 @@ def perform(result_value = nil, raise_error: false) | |||
end | |||
|
|||
it 'can preserve the job' do | |||
good_job.perform(destroy_after: false) | |||
current_preserve_job_records = GoodJob.preserve_job_records | |||
GoodJob.preserve_job_records = true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The RSpec-y way to do this is with a message stub which will be automatically cleaned up and reset at the end of the test example: allow(GoodJob).to receive(:preserve_job_records).and_return(true)
if GoodJob.preserve_job_records | ||
save! | ||
else | ||
destroy! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This reads so much better now with the positive condition coming first 🎉
spec/lib/good_job/job_spec.rb
Outdated
current_reperform_jobs_on_standard_error = GoodJob.reperform_jobs_on_standard_error | ||
current_preserve_job_records = GoodJob.preserve_job_records | ||
GoodJob.reperform_jobs_on_standard_error = true | ||
GoodJob.preserve_job_records = true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using message stubs allow this to be moved up to the context
block so that they are applied to all tests within that context block and avoid test setup repetition.
context 'when true' do
before do
allow(GoodJob).to receive(:reperform_jobs_on_standard_error).and_return(true)
allow(GoodJob).to receive(:preserve_job_records).and_return(true)
end
#....
5ca59ca
to
72ef163
Compare
@bensheldon updated and tests are green now. Thanks |
@morgoth Thank you! 🙌 |
Follow up to #136 (comment)