Delete stale branches

[berkerpeksag]

There are a lot of stale branches in the repo. I'm not sure they are still useful. Can we delete them?

Here is the list of the stale branches: https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/branches/stale

[tilgovi]

I'm okay to delete them. I think we should leave open any that are pull requests and just bump those threads separately so we can discuss what to do with each.

[benoitc]

+1

[berkerpeksag]

Ok, I've deleted some 5 years old branches.

[benoitc]

@berkerpeksag that's awesome! Should we close the ticket or any other branch in mind?

[tilgovi]

Deleted some more of my branches.

[berkerpeksag]

I haven't investigate all the branches yet, we can keep this open for a while :)

[benoitc]

right :)i also saw some branches i should take care...
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 08:34 Berker Peksag [email protected] wrote:

I haven't investigate all the branches yet, we can keep this open for a
while :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#991 (comment).

[tilgovi]

bump

[tilgovi]

Can we delete the python2.5 and the py24 branches yet? :-P

[tilgovi]

I just deleted these branches that were fully merged:

• 0.14x
• fix/309
• fix/478
• fix/567
• gh1157
• Can't terminate gunicorn_django via Ctrl-C in Script #355
• kill -HUP not reloading updated code with paster serve #358
• headers
• release/1.0.x
• sphinxdoc-and-newsite

I left feature/tcp_fastopen because it was recently reverted.

[benoitc]

👍

[benoitc]

@tilgovi totally supporting py26 is already something we should consider to stop imo also...

[berkerpeksag]

I also just deleted fix/1174 and djangoreload branches. The latter is not needed anymore since djangoapp.py will be removed by #1076.

[benoitc]

closing the issue as it seems we are OK with this now. Feel free to reopen the ticket if needed.

[benoitc]

also thanks for the work :)