Pull in Napa Paginate & Rabbit Publisher?

[shaqq]

@darbyfrey

It seems like these gems solve some common problems, and they don't necessarily force you do anything if they're installed.

[jdoconnor]

I recommend keeping these separate, as they can solve problems outside of
Napa, and Napa works fine without them.
On Oct 26, 2014 4:53 PM, "Shaker Islam" [email protected] wrote:

@darbyfrey https://github.com/darbyfrey

It seems like these gems solve some common problems, and they don't
necessarily force you do anything if they're installed.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#158.

[shaqq]

could we include them in the Gemfile when we scaffold services then?

[jdoconnor]

That makes sense to me.
On Oct 26, 2014 5:54 PM, "Shaker Islam" [email protected] wrote:

could we include them in the Gemfile when we scaffold services then?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#158 (comment).

[brandonweiss]

I could see adding NapaPagination to the scaffolded Gemfile, although NapaRabbitPublisher seems rather niche, don't you think? I think the average Napa user might paginate an endpoint, but it's going to be a really small percentage that are going to be running RabbitMQ.

[shaqq]

@brandonweiss yeah i'd agree, pagination makes more sense