Create UI: implement "Existing Business Information" component (step 1) - PART 1

[JazzarKarim]

• use existing search component
• apply search filters to only return A companies
• show results
• use dummy value for jurisdiction for now
• use dummy value for incorporation date for now
• if business is historical, show red block and cause this component to be invalid -- thus blocking the filing
  • active business display will be implemented in Create UI: implement "Existing Business Information" component (step 1) - PART 3 #20890
• handle Undo (go from results mode to initial mode and clear out any data)
• add unit tests for new code will be done in Create UI: implement "Existing Business Information" component (step 1) - PART 2 #20889

Note: business lookup will search for both active and historical A companies.

See #19462, #15315 and #15524 descriptions for additional details, but Figma is source of truth.

[severinbeauvais]

See #15314 description for possibly useful information.

[severinbeauvais]

Test Notes

As part of this ticket, I replace duplicated code with a new MessageBox component. This affects the following:

• message box when adding completing party to an incorporation application
• message box when adding completing party to a registration
• message box when adding a searched business or corporation to a registration
• message box on horizontal/vertical amalgamation office addresses step
• message box on first step of a voluntary dissolution
• message box at top of firm dissolution

[severinbeauvais]

@yuisotozaki Ready for your assurance, please and thanks.

You can create your own (named) continuation in draft, or try this one: https://dev.create.business.bcregistry.gov.bc.ca/continuation-in-business-home?id=TmCY3xvKFc

• try both options for existing business information (business search and manual entry)
• try selecting Active and Historical A companies
• try the validation (in this component, on this page, and app-wide)
• see the data on the review page
• try saving and resuming

If you see any needed changes, add a comment in this ticket, but I will fix them in #20889.

[yuisotozaki]

Observations - mostly errors in the design:

1. Typo in the blurb; "extraprovincially" - the design was incorrect at the time of implementation

2. This should be "continuation application" - the design was incorrect at the time of implementation

3. This should be "continuation application" - the design was incorrect at the time of implementation

4. Food for thought. Since we allow selection of a historical record, we should make sure that the user is guided back to step 1 as if the step is incomplete so that they see the guidance to contact the B.C. Registries.

[severinbeauvais]

Re: 4. Food for thought.

The component is not valid if a historical xpro is selected, so the Review page shows that the step is not finished, and the page shows the invalid section:

Were you thinking about more than this?

[yuisotozaki]

I think that makes sense. I'll ponder upon this further as we work towards step 5. I'd like to see the whole step 1 completed and see how it flows in these error cases.

[severinbeauvais]

I referenced your comments 1 through 3 in #20889. Can THIS ticket be moved to RFQA now?

[yuisotozaki]

Yes - Ready for QA.

[NaveenHebbale]

We showed in Sprint Demo.