Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 6, 2024. It is now read-only.

Update io_bazel_rules_docker commit hash to 21c19af #280

Merged

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Mar 8, 2019

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
io_bazel_rules_docker http_archive digest `` -> 21c19af

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @renovate-bot. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a bazelbuild member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title Update io_bazel_rules_docker commit hash to e9a0bc3 Update io_bazel_rules_docker commit hash to 8aff2e7 Mar 8, 2019
@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/io_bazel_rules_docker-digest branch from d778eb1 to 92c975b Compare March 8, 2019 23:55
@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title Update io_bazel_rules_docker commit hash to 8aff2e7 Update io_bazel_rules_docker commit hash to ac31e63 Mar 9, 2019
@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/io_bazel_rules_docker-digest branch from 92c975b to 32f5e21 Compare March 9, 2019 00:59
@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title Update io_bazel_rules_docker commit hash to ac31e63 Update io_bazel_rules_docker commit hash to 21c19af Mar 9, 2019
@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/io_bazel_rules_docker-digest branch from 32f5e21 to 383e70b Compare March 9, 2019 01:43
@nlopezgi
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@nlopezgi
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nlopezgi, renovate-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@forking-renovate
Copy link

PR has been edited

👷 This PR has received other commits, so Renovate will stop updating it to avoid conflicts or other problems. If you wish to abandon your changes and have Renovate start over you may click the "rebase" checkbox in the PR body/description.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Mar 11, 2019
@smukherj1
Copy link
Contributor

rules_docker is using the new PyInfo provider available in bazel 0.23.0 and later. Need to update the prow image to use bazel 0.23.0 or later to fix this

smukherj1 added a commit to smukherj1/test-infra that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2019
Blocking bazelbuild/rules_k8s#289 and
bazelbuild/rules_k8s#280 which need newer Bazel
version. Currently the image used by prow has Bazel 0.22.0
@tmc
Copy link

tmc commented Apr 22, 2019

/retest

@nlopezgi nlopezgi merged commit b623bdf into bazelbuild:master Apr 23, 2019
@nlopezgi
Copy link
Contributor

@tmc sorry for the delay and thanks for the poke

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants